Skip to content
← ML

/knowledge/notes/study-designs

Concept note · ML

Study Designs

Epidemiology

Studied
Self-study
When
2024
Applied in
Studied
Read / Refreshed
~5 min read2026-10-15

Case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies all compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed groups, but they sample differently and estimate different measures: odds ratios, risk ratios, or prevalence ratios. Choosing the wrong design can make causal inference impossible.

01

The idea

A case-control study samples on outcome: find cases (disease) and controls (no disease), then look back at exposure. It estimates the odds ratio: (odds of exposure | case) / (odds of exposure | control). You cannot estimate risk because you fixed the case:control ratio.

A cohort study samples on exposure: find exposed and unexposed groups, then follow forward to measure incidence. It estimates the risk ratio directly: P(disease | exposed) / P(disease | unexposed). A cross-sectional study samples once and measures both at the same time. It estimates prevalence, not incidence, and cannot establish temporal order.

02

The maths

03

Try it

TP
80
FP
20
FN
0
TN
0
Odds ratio
0.00
Risk ratio
1.00
OR = 0.00, RR = 1.00
Interactive demonstration of epidemiology concepts

04

Where I used it

05

Easy to get wrong

06

Sources

From self-study of epidemiology texts, focused on observational study design.