/knowledge/notes/study-designs
Concept note · ML
Study Designs
Epidemiology
- Studied
- Self-study
- When
- 2024
- Applied in
- Studied
- Read / Refreshed
- ~5 min read2026-10-15
Case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies all compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed groups, but they sample differently and estimate different measures: odds ratios, risk ratios, or prevalence ratios. Choosing the wrong design can make causal inference impossible.
01
The idea
A case-control study samples on outcome: find cases (disease) and controls (no disease), then look back at exposure. It estimates the odds ratio: (odds of exposure | case) / (odds of exposure | control). You cannot estimate risk because you fixed the case:control ratio.
A cohort study samples on exposure: find exposed and unexposed groups, then follow forward to measure incidence. It estimates the risk ratio directly: P(disease | exposed) / P(disease | unexposed). A cross-sectional study samples once and measures both at the same time. It estimates prevalence, not incidence, and cannot establish temporal order.
02
The maths
03
Try it
04
Where I used it
05
Easy to get wrong
06
Sources
From self-study of epidemiology texts, focused on observational study design.